Echtzeit@30: Q&A with Ignaz Schick

Ignaz Schick. (c) Cristina Marx/Photomusix


FJB: What is echtzeitmusik to you? Is what might be considered
echtzeitmusik connected through any approach, process, or sound result?

Ignaz Schick:
For me „Echtzeitmusik“ mostly is a community of similar minded musicians
who started arriving in Berlin in a particular time, from the fall of the
wall onwards, who were more or less from a similar generation and who were
asking similar questions, confronted with similar hardships, at a certain
moment of musical stand still within the first wave of European free jazz
and improvised music. A community who were researching similar musical
ideas or concepts and who often but not only improvised. For me
Echtzeitmusik never stood for a musical aesthetic or method, nor for a
style, …. What was new and maybe a key element was the use of extended
instrument techniques, instrument building, electro-acoustic sounds and
electronics, also the incorporation of formal/material elements inspired
from different streams of contemporary music (i.e. musique concrète,
minimalism, microtonality) but also a curiosity towards all kinds of forms
of experimental (underground) music like noise, ambient, song formats,
performance, sound installation. The development of course took its time
and over the years developed into a huge and fertile community with several
generations of musicians who quite soon started to be noticed worldwide, ….
But there is not such a thing like a typical sound or style, the musical
results are as diverse as its practitioners and characters. There is
sometimes still this cliché (mostly from outside of Berlin) that
Echtzeitmusik equals with „reductionism“, this has been attempted to be
propagated by a rather small group of players and influencers who pushed
into this directions in the late 90ies and early 2000s. There was an
extreme period of deep research into those realms, but at the same time
others were working into very different directions (i.e. new jazz and song
formats, noise, performance or even with techno and club music elements).


Is there something material – like demographics, affordability, or
cultural practices – about Berlin that you think makes such a scene
possible?



Definitely for the first 10 to 15 years it was the economic &
socio-political situation in Berlin in the time after the wall came down.
The city was financially broke, and had to re-organize after the collapse
of GDR system. The fall of the GDR system had created a vacuum mostly in
the East part of town, not only that there was an unclear real estate
situation, also politically all the beliefs and utopian hope of the left
were scattered, … There were tons of empty lots/houses/factories with
totally unclear ownership status, and people went into those houses and
squatted them, or rented them for almost nothing, or used them temporarily.
For us young musicians who were mostly ignored or not acknowledged by the
previous generation of aging free jazz heroes. Many of us were literally
kept out of the clubs and funded venues, but we could bypass this ignorance
and just create, experiment & explore and also perform concerts with
our new ideas in the squats. There was maybe not always excitement about
our music in such places, but a huge tolerance for our experiments as there
were new forms of living which were experimented with in the squats. We
didn’t make much money, but we also did not need much. The housing
conditions were often very rough (apartments with coal ovens, cold water,
no shower or toilet on the public stair case), but for me particularly as
for many others this did not matter, I grew up on a farm and I had a
similar childhood with little „confort“. Most important for us at the time
was: living costs & rents were extremely low. This attracted more and
more adventurous musicians and artists from all over the world. Rents for a
long time stayed extremely cheap, and as a result there were/are many spots
and venues were opened with no commercial pressure where musicians could
perform. And most improtant: nobody had to compromise his ideas and
concepts, we could be as radical as we wanted, we were in the underground
anyway, nobody told us how to play or adapt our music in a commercial way.
Musicians in this music want to perform, as often as possible, like in the
old jazz days, as we are developing a lot of our music live on stage. We
also always met and worked (…) on our music in rehearsals, but then it
really needs concerts to be able to evaluate your findings. In Berlin this
was always possible, in contrast to other cities also today you can still
play a lot, and this of course has always attracted a lot of adventurous
musicians and people from all over to move to Berlin. We have had an
amazing influx of fantastic players int he last 30 years, the whole range
from super young and unknown to also very known and established players who
want to be part of this amazing community…


In what ways do you think the scene has changed since your involvement
and what might have caused these changes?



Although that tendency started already in the 90ies it is way more
international now. The amount of musicians has probably trippled or
quadrupled. The level and the quality of musicianship has constantly been
raised. And the stylistic variety of the music is much more diverse today.
I think this happens quite naturally as all those people who moved to
Berlin also bring in their individual ideas, approaches and experiences and
they start merging and fusing with those already present. So the technical
quality is way more sophisticated and refined. In the early/mid 90ies the
sound of Echtzeit was more noisy and raw, in the meantime it went through
several phases of refinement but also through stylistic transitions.

Now there is more inter-collaboration of musicians from different stylistic
backgrounds (jazz, new music, sound art, noise, elects-acoustic), people
tend to think less in stylistic drawers. Many are involved in different
projects, that can resulting in different music every time.

Another thing I notice is that there is much more money/funding
involved, the scene grew up, got attention and gets financial support
from the cultural administrations. Which also is deeply needed now as
the days of cheap rent or empty spaces which can be used for free are
long over. Many of the musicians I started out with are now
internationally respected and renowned or have become professors. That
is pretty awesome I would say, but sometimes also feels a little
strange. And of course with the change of the monetary situation also
the conditions of production have changed: when I do projects, I have
to attempt to raise funds first in order to be able to pay my musician,
the venue, the technicians. This was definitely not the case in the
90ies, everything worked in a completely different way, ….


In what ways has the scene changed you and your musical
practice?



Hard to say, one thing most notably may be that I switched to
electronics at an early point in Berlin, … I did already use
electronics since I was a teenager and tried to incorporate
electronics into my set-up in my Munich days, but it was in Berlin
and the earlier Echtzeit days that I decided to make electronics my
main instrument for live-perfornance. And I went through a deep
research phase of sonic materials and alternative forms together
with my colleagues. For quite some years I did not compose nor play
saxophone in concerts anymore. I was busy researching and
developing my musical language on turntables and electronics. But
that is different now again, as I brought back composition,
saxophone, sound installation, visual arts, …. But this is
something the Berlin scene has been amazing with, this open
supportive climate which allows for people to experiment. I have
witnessed how many people have completely changed their sound &
concept of playing after they arrived here, there is a big
tolerance for extreme experimentation in Berlin, always has been.

What I definitely enjoy is this openess of the scene, like so many
people are experimenting and are learning from each other,
stimulating and challenging each other. I constantly involve with
younger musicians, from diverse stylistic backrounds, and I
constantly learn, I have to constantly rethink my playing … The
scene definitely taught me to stay awake, to keep on researching,
to stay curious, and to keep developing my skills and practice, ….


Are there any recordings, labels, venues, musicians, or other
participants you would like to shout out for cultivating the
scene, or that you feel are essential to it?


Well, that is a bit unfair and difficult, cause there are so many
amazing players, but definitely the whole first wave of Echtzeit
players like Andrea Neumann, Burkhard Beins, Annette Krebs, Axel
Dörner, Robin Hayward, Michael Renkel (=Phosphor) are always worth
to be checked out, but also players like Olaf Rupp, Tony Buck,
Margareth Kammerer, …. This are all aging veterans of our scene,
but they also stand for a certain reliable quality.

Nowdays it is more complex, as there are so many streams,
generations and approaches, all the new noise and electro-acoustic
artists, the ones who go more into sound art, pretty everyone in
Splitter Orchestra, but also all those people who are developing a
new hybrid form of jazz and contemporary music (like Christian
Lillinger, Achim Kaufmann, Oliver Steidle, Uli Kempendorff…). Or
what I call “the new young wild ones” around Loophole and
Multiversal (Rieko Okuda, Antti Virtaranta, Utku Tavil, …) who are
coming along with a totally different and often opposing musical
approach towards the first generation of Echtzeit. Some of this is
still in flux and development, but I really dig this next
generations as they are challenging the first generation and our
musical achievements. I don’t want to fall into the same trap door
of ignorance as did so many of the 1960ies players towards us when
we came up. I want to stay open and curious, even if I don’t always
understand what the young ones are doing. I want to keep learning,
and most you learn by playing with others, no matter if older, same
generation or younger.


And is there a recording of you or your work that you feel is
particularly representative of the scene?



I am not sure if I am particularly representative for the scene, I
have so many different interests stylistically, from EAI, new jazz,
new music, noise, sound art, electronic music. I think best is to
just check my archival series on Bandcamp (http://www.zarekberlin.bandcamp.com), there are a lot of different things and projects to explore,
music from various periods, …Soon I will also update the archival
series (…) with compositions of mine.

My recent activities besides long going groups like Perlonex have
been working with ILOG (with Oliver Steidle), Circuit Training or
Inside A Leaf, or the duos with Frank Gratkowski, Christian
Lillinger and Achim Kaufmann, or a larger group including Rieko
Okuda and others from that circle of musicians.


In September of this year, you had a month-long exhibition in
Berlin (and earlier in Munich) featuring other aspects of your
art, could you talk a little bit about how this work (sound
sculpture, graphical scores, LP-art) has evolved?


After secondary school I decided not to study music but visual art.
I had studied music since I was eleven, and I needed a different
perspective/look at things. (…) In parallel to my music I always
had a strong interest in painting/collage. I always tried to fuse
this two art forms, and a good way to go about this was doing
graphic scores, vinyl objects, music machines or sound
installations. I never really pushed a career in art. I found the
art market way more disgusting than the jazz (club/festival) scene.
Also my heavy touring routine did not allow a constant practice in
art. For logistic reasons I mostly worked into sketch books. But
from time to time I got invited and asked to do some stuff and then
in 2019 an old friend and supporter from the country side of
Bavaria, where I grew up, and who turned me onto music and art back
in the day, asked me to do an exhibition at his farm. He is an
amazing artist and music lover, he is 85 years old now and he still
organizes exhibitions at his farm which he converted in big parts
into a showroom. So I said yes, and the whole thing came out quite
beautiful, it was a little bit like a retrospective, and thus I
decided that it would be nice to show this works in Berlin as well,
but in a much smaller space. Like this the four chapters came
about, due to the size restrictions of the room. For „The Theory Of
Everything“ I made two new sound installations, and I showed also
two older ones, … With the four chapters I decided to change the
main installation once a week, the rest of the show stayed for the
whole time, … There were collages, graphic scores, cut-up vinyl
multiples and objects that I also often use in my turntable
performance and which often also have an attractive visual aspect,

Like in most of my works also in the sonic installations, I work
with found objects, I find stuff on the street, or on junkyards, or
over the internet, like old speakers, household items and left
behind stuff, and I assemble them in a new context. Like left
behind speakers which are prepared with glass cylinders cut out of
jars, and then I add objects to resonate. Through vibration, the
mechanical speaker vibration, objects are triggered to resonate
through sound waves. Or I use vibration motors from mobile phones,
massage machines or sex toys, and I trigger them through MIDI to
animate various metal objects, frame drums or Porzellane to
resonate through vibration, …. Usually I work in a serialist way,
like 48 source speakers, 22, speakers with fishing rods, or a swarm
of 46 metal objects, … Swarms, clouds, or symmetric rows, … This
way of working links it with the way I use turntables. Playing
turntables is also a way of recycling and re-composing existing
material into a completely new context. The same it is with scores,
I often use old photogrpachs or graphics from scientific books, I
cut them out or glue them into graphic scores and just change the
meaning of the parameters, like a graph of population growth
becomes pitch movement, or dynamics and so forth, …. It is playful,
but has a hidden system and logic, like translating from one sphere
to another.

– Q&A conducted by Paul Acquaro